NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionPareidolias, or visual misperceptions, are a non-motor symptom of Parkinson's disease (PD) with unclear pathophysiology. The noise pareidolia test (NPT) is a tool for screening pareidolias. The usefulness of the NPT in differentiating PD from atypical parkinsonian syndromes (APS) is also unknown.MethodsWe retrospectively investigated 74 patients with PD and 18 patients with APS who took the NPT. Correlations between the number of pareidolic responses, gray matter volume, and cerebral blood flow were also examined in the patients with PD.ResultsThe median number of pareidolic responses in patients with PD and patients with APS was 0 (interquartile range (IQR): 0-3) and 0 (IQR: 0-1), respectively, and tended to be higher in patients with PD than in those with APS (p = 0.077). It was significantly higher in patients with PD who had hallucinations (2; IQR: 0-9) (p = 0.016). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the number of pareidolic responses in the NPT was 0.62 when used to differentiate PD and APS, and the optimal cutoff number of pareidolic responses was 2/3. Sensitivity and specificity were 25.7% and 100%, respectively. In the PD group, the number of pareidolic responses was correlated with age (r = 0.27; p = 0.021) and the Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) score (r = -0.34; p = 0.0099). Magnetic resonance imaging showed no significant correlation between the number of pareidolic responses and the volume of focal gray matter. On cerebral hypoperfusion mapping, the left parietal lobe had a significant correlation with the number of pareidolic responses (r = 0.35; p = 0.027).ConclusionThe number of pareidolic responses in NPT was suggested to be useful as a red flag to rule out APS in differentiating PD from APS. In PD without dementia, the number of pareidolic responses was associated with reduced blood flow in the left parietal lobe.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.