SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Impacts of gait freeze on quality of life in Parkinson's disease, from the perspectives of patients and their carers.

Ir J Med Sci · 2024-04-19

DOI: 10.1007/s11845-024-03673-xPMID: 38639839

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe World Health Organisation (WHO) reports that morbidity and mortality due to Parkinson's disease (PD) are increasing faster than for other neurodegenerative conditions. People with Parkinson's (PwP) present with a variety of motor symptoms, such as tremor, bradykinesia, and rigidity. Freezing of gait (FoG) is a significant motor symptom that manifests as temporary episodes of inability to move one's feet, despite the intention to walk.AimsThis study examined the impact of FoG on quality of life (QoL) within an Irish cohort of PwP, from the perspectives of both PwP and their carers, using validated questionnaires that had been adapted for online use.MethodsPwP and their carers were recruited by outreach to the Irish Parkinson's Community. Anonymous online questionnaires were distributed, which combined a demographic survey with several clinically validated surveys, including Freezing of Gait Questionnaire (FoG-Q), Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire 8 (PDQ-8), and Parkinson's Disease Carer Questionnaire (PDQ-C).ResultsThere was a strong correlation (p ConclusionsThis study shows that FoG is a significant detriment to the QoL of PwP, from the perspectives of patients and carers. This method of assessing FoG and QoL using online questionnaires has potential to enhance the reach and flexibility of this type of research. These findings will inform future studies on larger cohorts and highlight unmet clinical needs in PwP.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.