SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Feasibility of regional center telehealth visits utilizing a rural research network in people with Parkinson's disease.

J Clin Transl Sci · 2024-03-25

DOI: 10.1017/cts.2024.498PMID: 38655451

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundImpaired motor and cognitive function can make travel cumbersome for People with Parkinson's disease (PwPD). Over 50% of PwPD cared for at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) Movement Disorders Clinic reside over 30 miles from Little Rock. Improving access to clinical care for PwPD is needed.ObjectiveTo explore the feasibility of remote clinic-to-clinic telehealth research visits for evaluation of multi-modal function in PwPD.MethodsPwPD residing within 30 miles of a UAMS Regional health center were enrolled and clinic-to-clinic telehealth visits were performed. Motor and non-motor disease assessments were administered and quantified. Results were compared to participants who performed at-home telehealth visits using the same protocols during the height of the COVID pandemic.ResultsCompared to the at-home telehealth visit group (n = 50), the participants from regional centers (n = 13) had similar age and disease duration, but greater disease severity with higher total Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale scores (Z = -2.218, p = 0.027) and lower Montreal Cognitive Assessment scores (Z = -3.350, p p p = 0.003), and lived in more socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhoods (Z = -3.120, p = 0.002). Prior research participation was lower in the regional center group (Pearson's chi = 4.5, p = 0.034) but both groups indicated interest in future research participation.ConclusionsRegional center research visits in PwPD in medically underserved areas are feasible and could help improve access to care and research participation in these traditionally underrepresented populations.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.