SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Non-motor symptoms in PD evaluated during pharmacological ON state by a new tool: The NoMoS-ON scale. Is always the "ON" state beneficial?

Parkinsonism Relat Disord · 2024-06-07

DOI: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2024.107036PMID: 38870556

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectivesTo evaluate non-motor symptoms (NMS) occurring during ON pharmacological state and validate a new questionnaire, the Non-motor symptoms-ON scale (NoMoS-ON), exploring ON NMS in Parkinson's disease (PD).Material and methodsPatients with PD were evaluated by a new questionnaire, the NoMoS-ON scale, evaluating 17 items related to the main symptoms experienced during the ON state. PD patients who experienced at least one symptom in ON were defined ON-NMS+. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability of NoMoS-ON scale were also assessed.ResultsOne-hundred and thirty-seven PD patients were consecutively enrolled (79 men and 58 women, age 69.4 ± 9.5 years (mean ± SD)). Seventy-seven patients were ON-NMS+ (56.6 %). PD patients with short disease duration (ConclusionsThe NoMoS-ON scale is a valid, reproducible and reliable questionnaire capturing the ON NMS in PD. PD patients with disease duration shorter than 7 years showed the presence of unpleasant NMS whereas those with longer disease duration experienced pleasant non-motor features. This could help the physician in the therapy management of PD patients in different phases of their disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.