SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Statin use and risk of Parkinson's disease among older adults in Japan: a nested case-control study using the Longevity Improvement and Fair Evidence study.

Brain Commun · 2024-06-04

DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae195PMID: 38894948

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The association between statin use and the risk of Parkinson's disease remains inconclusive, particularly in Japan's super-ageing society. This study aimed to investigate the potential association between statin use and the risk of Parkinson's disease among Japanese participants aged ≥65 years. We used data from the Longevity Improvement and Fair Evidence Study, which included medical and long-term care claim data from April 2014 to December 2020 across 17 municipalities. Using a nested case-control design, we matched one case to five controls based on age, sex, municipality and cohort entry year. A conditional logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Among the 56 186 participants (9397 cases and 46 789 controls), 53.6% were women. The inverse association between statin use and Parkinson's disease risk was significant after adjusting for multiple variables (odds ratio: 0.61; 95% confidence interval: 0.56-0.66). Compared with non-users, the dose analysis revealed varying odds ratios: 1.30 (1.12-1.52) for 1-30 total standard daily doses, 0.77 (0.64-0.92) for 31-90 total standard daily doses, 0.62 (0.52-0.75) for 91-180 total standard daily doses and 0.30 (0.25-0.35) for >180 total standard daily doses. Statin use among older Japanese adults was associated with a decreased risk of Parkinson's disease. Notably, lower cumulative statin doses were associated with an elevated risk of Parkinson's disease, whereas higher cumulative doses exhibited protective effects against Parkinson's disease development.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.