SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Age- and Parkinson-related differences in trunk and lower-limb muscle activation during four balance tasks: A case-control pilot study.

Clin Biomech (Bristol) · 2024-06-23

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2024.106298PMID: 38936292

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundPoor postural control has been reported in people with Parkinson's disease, which could be explained by the changes in muscular activation patterns related to antigravitational muscles. This study aims to measure the muscle activation of antigravitational muscles during balance tasks in individuals, with and without Parkinson's.MethodsSixteen (16) participants (9 with Parkinson's), aged ≥65 yrs., performed 2 × 30-s trials of 4 balance tasks (bipodal and semi-tandem opened eyes and closed eyes) on a force platform (center of pressure measurement); while surface electromyography measurements were obtained bilaterally on the multifidus at L5, biceps femoris and medialis gastrocnemius. Electromyography amplitude analysis was processed by the Root Mean Square (250 ms window epochs) and normalized by the peak of activation during the balance task, to determine each muscle's activity level.FindingsThe Parkinson's group reported lower muscle activation than control across tasks (in mean for multifidus = 8%, biceps femoris = 16%, gastrocnemius = 7%), although not statistically significant. Parkinson's reported significantly poorer postural control than control, mainly for the center of pressure sway ellipse area (p = 0.016) from challenge balance tasks such as semi-tandem.InterpretationPoor postural control was confirmed in the Parkinson's group, but not significantly associated by the changes from muscle activation of trunk and lower limbs, during balance performance.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.