NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionThe current approach to assessing bradykinesia in Parkinson's Disease relies on the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), which is a numeric scale. Inertial sensors offer the ability to probe subcomponents of bradykinesia: motor speed, amplitude, and rhythm. Thus, we sought to investigate the differential effects of high-frequency compared to low-frequency subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) on these quantified facets of bradykinesia.MethodsWe recruited advanced Parkinson's Disease subjects with a chronic bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS implantation to a single-blind stimulation trial where each combination of medication state (OFF/ON), electrode contacts, and stimulation frequency (60 Hz/180 Hz) was assessed. The Kinesia One sensor system was used to measure upper limb bradykinesia. For each stimulation trial, subjects performed extremity motor tasks. Sensor data were recorded continuously. We identified STN DBS parameters that were associated with improved upper extremity bradykinesia symptoms using a mixed linear regression model.ResultsWe recruited 22 subjects (6 females) for this study. The 180 Hz STN DBS (compared to the 60 Hz STN DBS) and dopaminergic medications improved all subcomponents of upper extremity bradykinesia (motor speed, amplitude, and rhythm). For the motor rhythm subcomponent of bradykinesia, ventral contacts yielded improved symptom improvement compared to dorsal contacts.ConclusionThe differential impact of high- and low-frequency STN DBS on the symptoms of bradykinesia may advise programming for these patients but warrants further investigation. Wearable sensors represent a valuable addition to the armamentarium that furthers our ability to conduct objective, quantitative clinical assessments.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.