SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

DRD2 activation inhibits choroidal neovascularization in patients with Parkinson's disease and age-related macular degeneration.

J Clin Invest · 2024-07-16

DOI: 10.1172/jci174199PMID: 39012703

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) remains a major cause of visual impairment and puts considerable burden on patients and health care systems. l-DOPA-treated Parkinson's disease (PD) patients have been shown to be partially protected from nAMD, but the mechanism remains unknown. Using murine models that combine 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine-induced (MPTP-induced) PD and laser-induced nAMD with standard PD treatment of l-DOPA/DOPA-decarboxylase inhibitor or specific dopamine receptor inhibitors, we here demonstrate that l-DOPA treatment-induced increase of dopamine-mediated dopamine receptor D2 (DRD2) signaling inhibits choroidal neovascularization independently of MPTP-associated nigrostriatal pathway lesion. Analyzing a retrospective cohort of more than 200,000 patients with nAMD receiving anti-VEGF treatment from the French nationwide insurance database, we show that DRD2 agonist-treated PD patients have a significantly delayed age of onset of nAMD and reduced need for anti-VEGF therapies, similar to the effects of the l-DOPA treatment. While providing a mechanistic explanation for an intriguing epidemiological observation, our findings suggest that systemic DRD2 agonists might constitute an adjuvant therapy to delay and reduce the need for anti-VEGF therapy in patients with nAMD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.