Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Parkinson's disease (PD) is characterized by decreased dopamine in the basal ganglia that causes excessive tonic inhibition of the thalamus. This excessive inhibition seems to explain inhibitory motor symptoms in PD, but the source of tremor remains unclear. This paper investigates how neural inhibition may change the closed-loop characteristics of the human motor control system to determine how this established pathophysiology could produce tremor. The rate-coding model of neural signals suggests increased inhibition decreases signal amplitude, which could create a mismatch between the closed-loop dynamics and the internal models that overcome proprioceptive feedback delays. This paper aims to identify a candidate model structure with decreased-amplitude-induced tremor in PD that also agrees with previously recorded movements of healthy and cerebellar patients. The optimal feedback control theory of human motor control forms the basis of the model. Key additional elements include gating of undesired movements via the basal ganglia-thalamus-motor cortex circuit and the treatment of the efferent copy of the control input as a measurement in the state estimator. Simulations confirm the model's ability to capture tremor in PD and also demonstrate how disease progression could affect tremor and other motor symptoms, providing insight into the existence of tremor and non-tremor phenotypes. Altogether, the physiological underpinnings of the model structure and the agreement of model predictions with clinical observations provides support for the hypothesis that unstable feedback produces parkinsonian tremor. Consequently, these results also support the associated framework for the neuroanatomy of human motor control.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.