SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

COVID-19 and Parkinson's disease: a single-center study and Mendelian randomization study.

Sci Rep · 2024-07-17

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-66197-5PMID: 39020020

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

To investigate the association between COVID-19 and Parkinson's disease (PD) via a single-center study and a Mendelian randomization (MR) study. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among PD patients at a single center from December 7, 2022, to March 10, 2023. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the infection-related risk factors. Subsequently, bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization was employed to explore the association between COVID-19 and PD. In the cross-sectional analysis, it was found that the prevalence of COVID-19 infection in PD patients was 65.7%. Forty-eight (35.3%) PD patients experienced exacerbation of motor symptoms following COVID-19 infection. Long PD disease duration (≥ 10 years) (OR: 3.327, P = 0.045) and long time since last vaccination (> 12 m) (OR: 4.916, P = 0.035) were identified as significant risk factors related to infection. The MR analysis results supported that PD increases the COVID-19 susceptibility (β = 0.081, OR = 1.084, P = 0.006). However, the MR analysis showed that PD did not increases the COVID-19 severity and hospitalization, and no significant association of COVID-19 on PD was observed. The findings from this cross-sectional study suggest that individuals with PD may experience worsened motor symptoms following COVID-19 infection. Long disease duration (≥10 years) and long time since last vaccination (> 12 m) are identified as important risk factors for infection in these patients. Furthermore, our MR study provides evidence supporting an association between PD and COVID-19 susceptibility.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.