SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

7-Amino-[1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a][1,3,5]triazines as CK1δ inhibitors: Exploring substitutions at the 2 and 5-positions.

Bioorg Chem · 2024-07-17

DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2024.107659PMID: 39059072

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

CK1δ is a serine-threonine kinase involved in several pathological conditions including neuroinflammation and neurodegenerative disorders like Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Specifically, it seems that an inhibition of CK1δ could have a neuroprotective effect in these conditions. Here, a series of [1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-a][1,3,5]triazines were developed as ATP-competitive CK1δ inhibitors. Both positions 2 and 5 have been explored leading to a total of ten compounds exhibiting IC50s comprised between 29.1 µM and 2.08 µM. Three of the four most potent compounds (IC50 < 3 µM) bear a thiophene ring at the 2 position. All compounds have been submitted to computational studies that identified the chain composed of at least 2 atoms (e.g., nitrogen and carbon atoms) at the 5 position as crucial to determine a key bidentate hydrogen bond with Leu85 of CK1δ. Most potent compounds have been tested in vitro, resulting passively permeable to the blood-brain barrier and, safe and slight neuroprotective on a neuronal cell model. These results encourage to further structural optimize the series to obtain more potent CK1δ inhibitors as possible neuroprotective agents to be tested on models of the above-mentioned neurodegenerative diseases.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.