Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
In Parkinson's disease, neuroinflammation is a double-edged sword; when inflammation occurs it can have harmful effects, despite its important role in battling infections and healing tissue. Once triggered by microglia, astrocytes acquire a reactive state and shift from supporting the survival of neurons to causing their destruction. Activated microglia and Proteinase-activated receptor-2 (PAR2) are key points in the regulation of neuroinflammation. 1-Piperidin Propionic Acid (1-PPA) has been recently described as a novel inhibitor of PAR2. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of 1-PPA in neuroinflammation and microglial activation in Parkinson's disease. Protein aggregates and PAR2 expression were analyzed using Thioflavin S assay and immunofluorescence in cultured human fibroblasts from Parkinson's patients, treated or untreated with 1-PPA. A significant decrease in amyloid aggregates was observed after 1-PPA treatment in all patients. A parallel decrease in PAR2 expression, which was higher in sporadic Parkinson's patients, was also observed both at the transcriptional and protein level. In addition, in mouse LPS-activated microglia, the inflammatory profile was significantly downregulated after 1-PPA treatment, with a remarkable decrease in IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α, together with a decreased expression of PAR2. In conclusion, 1-PPA determines the reduction in neuroglia inflammation and amyloid aggregates formation, suggesting that the pharmacological inhibition of PAR2 could be proposed as a novel strategy to control neuroinflammation.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.