SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A novel voice classification based on Gower distance for Parkinson disease detection.

Int J Med Inform · 2024-08-02

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2024.105583PMID: 39096595

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundTraditional classifier for the classification of diseases, such as K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Random Forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM), often struggle with high-dimensional medical datasets.ObjectiveThis study presents a novel classifier to overcome the limitations of traditional classifiers in Parkinson's disease (PD) detection based on Gower distance.MethodsWe present the Gower distance metric to handle diverse feature sets in voice recordings, which acts as a dissimilarity measure for all feature types, making the model adept at identifying subtle patterns indicative of PD. Additionally, the Cuckoo Search algorithm is employed for feature selection, reducing dimensionality by focusing on key features, thereby lessening the computational load associated with high-dimensional datasets.ResultsThe proposed classifier based on Gower distance resulted in an accuracy rate of 98.3% with feature selection and achieved an accuracy of 94.92% without the feature selection method. It outperforms traditional classifiers and recent studies in PD detection from voice recordings.ConclusionsThis accuracy shows the capability of the approach in the correct classification of instances and points out the potential of the approach as a reliable diagnostic tool for the medical practitioner. The findings state that the proposed approach holds promise for improving the diagnosis and monitoring of PD, both within medical institutions and at homes for the elderly.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.