SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Association between pain threshold and manifested pain assessed using a PD-specific pain scale in Parkinson's disease.

Front Neurol · 2024-07-25

DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1420696PMID: 39131046

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe neurodegenerative process in Parkinson's disease (PD) affects both dopaminergic and non-dopaminergic structures, which determine the wide range of motor and non-motor symptoms (NMS), including different types of pain. Diverse mechanisms contribute to pain in PD. Abnormal nociceptive processing is considered a distinctive feature of the disease.ObjectiveIn the present study, we used a validated PD-specific pain assessment tool to investigate self-reported pain in PD patients and to analyze the association with the objective pain threshold.MethodsThe RIII component of the nociceptive flexor reflex was assessed in 35 patients with PD and was compared to 40 healthy controls. Self-reported pain was measured using the Bulgarian version of the King's Parkinson's Disease Pain Scale (KPPS-BG). A correlation analysis was used to investigate the relationship between the objective nociceptive threshold and PD pain as assessed by KPPS-BG.ResultsPD patients had a significantly lower RIII threshold than control individuals (the mean SD value was 6.24 ± 1.39 vs. 10.33 ± 1.64) when assessed in the "off" state. A statistically significant (p ConclusionThe results of the present study demonstrate the important role of increased spinal nociception in the occurrence of pain, which is associated with fluctuations and, to a lesser extent, nocturnal pain.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.