SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Influence of Depression on the Quality of Life in Patients With Parkinson's Disease in Southwest Nigeria.

Cureus · 2024-07-22

DOI: 10.7759/cureus.65077PMID: 39171038

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background Parkinson's disease (PD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder that significantly impacts patients' quality of life (QoL). Depression is a common comorbidity in patients with PD, potentially exacerbating QoL deterioration. This study aimed to assess the influence of depression on QoL in patients with PD at Ladoke Akintola University of Technology (LAUTECH), Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Methodology A cross-sectional, descriptive study design was utilized. The study included 420 patients with PD attending the Neurology Clinic at LAUTECH. A purposive sampling technique was employed to select participants. Data collection instruments included the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) for PD assessment, the Hoehn and Yahr scale for PD staging, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) for depression evaluation, and the Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 (PDQ-39) for QoL assessment. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY), with descriptive and inferential statistics (Chi-square test) to determine associations, considering a P-value P = 0.000). Patients with severe depression reported the poorest QoL, while those with minimal to no depression reported the highest QoL scores. Conclusions Depression significantly impacts the QoL in patients with PD at LAUTECH in southwest Nigeria. Addressing depression in PD management is crucial to improve patient outcomes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.