Association between dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor use and risk of Parkinson's disease among patients with diabetes mellitus: a retrospect

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundHow a person's Parkinson disease (PD) risk is affected by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors remains unclear. We evaluated the association of PD risk with use of these inhibitors in individuals diagnosed as having diabetes mellitus (DM).MethodsIndividuals diagnosed as having new-onset DM were enrolled into the case group and comparison group, comprising patients who received a DPP-4 inhibitor and a sulfonylurea, respectively. These groups were matched through propensity score matching on the basis of income level, gender, urbanization level, enrollment year, age, and diabetes complications severity index score. The case group was divided into subgroups on the basis of whether they had a cumulative defined daily dose (cDDD) of 150. The DPP-4 inhibitor-PD risk association was evaluated through a Cox proportional hazards model. The Bonferroni adjustment test was employed to adjust P-values and reduce the false positive rate.ResultsCompared with those in the comparison group (treatment with a sulfonylurea), patients with a DPP-4 inhibitor cDDD of >150 had a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.30 for PD development (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.97-1.73; adjusted P = .263); the HRs for patients with a cDDD of P = .886) and 1.06 (95% CI: 0.75-1.50; adjusted P = .886), respectively. We noted nonsignificant differences regarding the associations between the use of the various DPP-4 inhibitors (linagliptin, saxagliptin, sitagliptin, and vildagliptin) and PD risk after adjustment for any individual inhibitor (adjusted P > .05).ConclusionsDPP-4 inhibitors were discovered in this study to not be associated with increased PD risk. This result was confirmed when the analysis was conducted individually for the 4 investigated DPP-4 inhibitors (sitagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and vildagliptin).

Scientific assessment

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.