Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
PurposeTo describe the effects of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) on the speech of Spanish-speaking Parkinson's disease (PD) patients during the first year of treatment.MethodsThe speech measures (SMs): maximum phonation time, acoustic voice measures, speech rate, speech intelligibility measures, and oral diadochokinesis rates of nine Colombian idiopathic PD patients (four females and five males; age = 63 ± 7 years; years of PD = 10 ± 7 years; UPDRS-III = 57 ± 6; H&Y = 2 ± 0.3) were studied in OFF and ON medication states before and every three months during the first year after STN-DBS surgery. Praat software and healthy native listeners' ratings were used for speech analysis. Statistical analysis tried to find significant differences in the SMs during follow-up (Friedman test) and between medication states (Wilcoxon paired test). Also, a pre-surgery variation interval (PSVI) of reference for every participant and SM was calculated to make an individual analysis of post-surgery variation.ResultsNon-significative post-surgery or medication state-related differences in the SMs were found. Nevertheless, individually, based on PSVIs, the SMs exhibited: no variation, inconsistent or consistent variation during post-surgery follow-up in different combinations, depending on the medication state.ConclusionAs a group, participants did not have a shared post-surgery pattern of change in any SM. Instead, based on PSVIs, the SMs varied differently in every participant, which suggests that in Spanish-speaking PD patients, the effects of STN-DBS on speech during the first year of treatment could be highly variable.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.