Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundAtrazine (ATR), a commonly used herbicide, is linked to dopaminergic neurotoxicity, which may cause symptoms resembling Parkinson's disease (PD). This study aims to reveal the molecular regulatory networks responsible for ATR exposure and its effects on dopaminergic neurotoxicity based on an integration strategy.MethodsOur approach involved network toxicology, construction of protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks, gene ontology (GO), and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis, as well as molecular docking techniques. Subsequently, we validated the predicted results in PC12 cells in vitro.ResultsAn integrated analysis strategy indicating that 5 hub targets, including mitogen-activated protein kinase 3 (Mapk3), catalase (Cat), heme oxygenase 1 (Hmox1), tumor protein p53 (Tp53), and prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (Ptgs2), may play a crucial role in ATR-induced dopaminergic injury. Molecular docking indicated that the 5 hub targets exhibited certain binding activity with ATR. Cell counting kit-8 (CCK8) results illustrated a dose-response relationship in PC12 cells. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) displayed notable changes in the expression of hub targets mRNA levels, with the exception of Mapk3. Western blotting results suggested that ATR treatment in PC12 cells resulted in an upregulation of the Cat, Hmox1, and p-Mapk3 protein expression levels while causing a downregulation in Tp53, Ptgs2, and Mapk3.ConclusionOur findings indicated that 5 hub targets identified could play a vital role in ATR-induced dopaminergic neurotoxicity in PC12 cells. These results provide preliminary support for further investigation into the molecular mechanism of ATR-induced toxicity.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.