SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Interpretable discriminant analysis for functional data supported on random nonlinear domains with an application to Alzheimer's disease.

J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol · 2024-03-22

DOI: 10.1093/jrsssb/qkae023PMID: 39279915

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

We introduce a novel framework for the classification of functional data supported on nonlinear, and possibly random, manifold domains. The motivating application is the identification of subjects with Alzheimer's disease from their cortical surface geometry and associated cortical thickness map. The proposed model is based upon a reformulation of the classification problem as a regularized multivariate functional linear regression model. This allows us to adopt a direct approach to the estimation of the most discriminant direction while controlling for its complexity with appropriate differential regularization. Our approach does not require prior estimation of the covariance structure of the functional predictors, which is computationally prohibitive in our application setting. We provide a theoretical analysis of the out-of-sample prediction error of the proposed model and explore the finite sample performance in a simulation setting. We apply the proposed method to a pooled dataset from Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative and Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative. Through this application, we identify discriminant directions that capture both cortical geometric and thickness predictive features of Alzheimer's disease that are consistent with the existing neuroscience literature.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.