SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Pharmacokinetics and Dose Proportionality Study of a Novel Antiparkinsonian Agent, a 1<i>H</i>-1,2,4-Triazol-3-ylthio-conjugate of Prottremine.

Molecules · 2024-09-22

DOI: 10.3390/molecules29184498PMID: 39339493

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

The novel antiparkinsonian agent PA-96 is the focus of our research. PA-96 supported the survival of cultured naïve dopamine neurons, alleviated motor deficits in MPTP and haloperidol-based mice models of Parkinson's disease, and increased the density of tyrosine hydroxylase positive neurons and dopamine concentration in the midbrain of an MPTP-damaged brain. In this work, an HPLC-MS/MS method was developed and validated, and the pharmacokinetics of the agent was investigated in mice after a single or multiple oral administration (p.o.) and intravenous injection (i.v.) at various doses. The dose proportionality was also evaluated after a single p.o. administration of three ascending doses (1, 5, and 10 mg/kg) and a single i.v. injection of two doses (1 and 10 mg/kg); also, the bioavailability was estimated. The disproportionality of pharmacokinetic parameters could be explained by the saturation of active centres of enzymes or receptors binding the substance: at low doses, part of the compound is bound, leaving a small amount circulating in blood, and rapidly metabolised and/or bound too. The bioavailability of PA-96 was c.a. 7 and 35% for the doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg, correspondingly.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.