Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a prevalent neurodegenerative disorder with poor prognosis. Observational studies have demonstrated a significant correlation between serum galectin-3 and PD, suggesting a potential role of galectin-3 as a biomarker for PD. However, it is still unclear whether galectin-3 contributes to the risk of the disease.MethodsA two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach was used in this study. Genetic instruments for serum galectin-3 level were selected from a genome-wide association study (GWAS), including 30,931 European individuals. Summary-level statistics for PD were derived from another published GWAS, including 33,674 cases and 449,056 controls. Primary analysis was conducted using the inverse-variance weighting (IVW) method. Weighted median, MR-Egger, simple mode, weighted mode, and MR-pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) methods were used as complementary analyses. To detect heterogeneity, Cochran's Q statistic and leave-one-out analysis were used. For testing potential horizontal pleiotropy, the MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO global test were conducted.ResultsMR analysis using IVW model (OR 1.112, 95% CI 1.025-1.206, p = 0.010), weighted median (OR 1.135, 95% CI 1.037-1.242, p = 0.006), weighted mode (OR 1.142, 95% CI 1.038-1.257, p = 0.030), and MR-PRESSO (OR 1.112, 95% CI 1.046-1.182, p = 0.012) presented a consistent result, indicating that increased serum galectin-3 was associated with a higher risk of PD. No heterogeneity or horizontal pleiotropy was detected in the analyses.ConclusionsThe study shows a suggestive association between galectin-3 and PD. Increasing serum galectin-3 was associated with an increase in PD risk. Galectin-3 may play an important role in the causal pathway to PD.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.