SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Foot-Floor Contact Sequences: A Metric for Gait Assessment in Parkinson's Disease after Deep Brain Stimulation.

Sensors (Basel) · 2024-10-13

DOI: 10.3390/s24206593PMID: 39460074

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Digital gait monitoring is increasingly used to assess locomotion and fall risk. The aim of this work is to analyze the changes in the foot-floor contact sequences of Parkinson's Disease (PD) patients in the year following the implantation of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). During their best-ON condition, 30 PD patients underwent gait analysis at baseline (T0), at 3 months after subthalamic nucleus DBS neurosurgery (T1), and at 12 months (T2) after subthalamic nucleus DBS neurosurgery. Thirty age-matched controls underwent gait analysis once. Each subject was equipped with bilateral foot-switches and a 5 min walk was recorded, including both straight-line and turnings. The walking speed, turning time, stride time variability, percentage of atypical gait cycles, stance, swing, and double support duration were estimated. Overall, the gait performance of PD patients improved after DBS, as also confirmed by the decrease in their UPDRS-III scores from 19.4 ± 1.8 to 10.2 ± 1.0 (T0 vs. T2) (p p p < 0.001). Therefore, in straight-line walking, the atypical cycles decreased by 72% at T1, and by 54% at T2 (with respect to baseline), while, in turnings, atypical cycles decreased by 43% at T1, and by 20% at T2. The percentage of atypical gait cycles proved an informative digital biomarker for quantifying PD gait changes after DBS, both in straight-line paths and turnings.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.