SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A de novo missense mutation in PPP2R5D alters dopamine pathways and morphology of iPSC-derived midbrain neurons.

Stem Cells · 2025-01-01

DOI: 10.1093/stmcls/sxae068PMID: 39460716

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) models of neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs) have promoted an understanding of commonalities and differences within or across patient populations by revealing the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms contributing to disease pathology. Here, we focus on developing a human model for PPP2R5D-related NDD, called Jordan syndrome, which has been linked to Early-Onset Parkinson's Disease (EOPD). Here we sought to understand the underlying molecular and cellular phenotypes across multiple cell states and neuronal subtypes in order to gain insight into Jordan syndrome pathology. Our work revealed that iPSC-derived midbrain neurons from Jordan syndrome patients display significant differences in dopamine-associated pathways and neuronal architecture. We then evaluated a CRISPR-based approach for editing heterozygous dominant G-to-A mutations at the transcript level in patient-derived neural stem cells. Our findings show that site-directed RNA editing is influenced by sgRNA length and cell type. These studies support the potential for a CRISPR RNA editor system to selectively edit mutant transcripts harboring G-to-A mutations in neural stem cells while providing an alternative editing technology for those suffering from NDDs.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.