SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Metabolic biomarkers of appetite control in Parkinson's disease patients with and without cognitive impairment.

Clin Nutr ESPEN · 2024-11-02

DOI: 10.1016/j.clnesp.2024.10.167PMID: 39491667

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundAppetite dysregulation in Parkinson's Disease (PD) appears to be linked to physical and cognitive deterioration. PD patients with and without cognitive impairment (CI) were compared to an age-matched control group to explore predictors of appetite control in fasting and post-prandial conditions.MethodsFifty-five patients were recruited and divided into three groups: twenty controls (age: 74 y, BMI: 25.8 kg/m2), nineteen PD patients without CI (72.5 y, 25.1 kg/m2) and sixteen PD patients with CI (74.3 y, 24.0 kg/m2). Self-reported appetite perception and circulating blood metabolic biomarkers were measured in fasting and over a 3-h post-prandial period. Biomarkers included glucose, insulin, tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), leptin, acyl-ghrelin, total ghrelin, peptide YY (PYY), glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP-1), insulin growth factor 1 (IGF-1), growth factor (GF) and triglycerides. Patients were then provided with a mixed meal to eat ad libitum with the aim to evaluate links between metabolic biomarkers and control of energy intake.ResultsPD patients with CI had a significant lower protein intake (7.4 ± 2.5 g, p = 0.01) compared to controls (21.9 ± 3.1 g) and PD patients without CI (14.3 ± 3.0 g). Post-prandial plasma GLP-1 concentrations were associated with decreased hunger perception (B±SE, -5.3 ± 2.4  mm·h-1, p = 0.04). PYY concentrations were significantly associated with GLP-1 in fasting (r = 0.40, p = 0.005) and post-prandial (r = 0.46, p ConclusionsPYY and GLP-1 appeared to influence appetite control in PD patients and their roles merit further investigation.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.