SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Online training program maintains motor functions and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Front Digit Health · 2024-11-13

DOI: 10.3389/fdgth.2024.1486662PMID: 39606179

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveSeveral systematic reviews have shown that physical exercise positively affects motor function (MF) and quality of life (QoL) in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). After the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, numerous studies were conducted to reveal the effects of telerehabilitation for patients with PD. However, only a few empirical results of online programs for PD patients have been reported. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the effects of an online physical and cognitive training program on MF and QoL in patients with PD.MethodsWe evaluated the impact of our online program on the QoL and MF of patients with PD by comparing data at baseline and after six months of intervention. For the QoL assessment, we used the Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living scale and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39), whereas, for MF, we measured movement status using the modified 20-m walk test and timed up-and-go (TUG) test.ResultsWe enrolled 20 patients for QoL and 19 for MF in this study. For PDQ-39, social support (p = 0.046, δ = 0.320) and cognitions (p = 0.028, δ = 0.268) significantly improved. Additionally, cadence (p = 0.032, g = -0.377) in the modified 20-m walk and exam duration (p = 0.003, δ = 0.296) and forward gait (p = 0.003, δ = 0.341) in the TUG test showed significant differences before and after the intervention.ConclusionOur results suggest that online physical and cognitive training programs positively affect MF and QoL in individuals with PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.