SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Dissecting Causal Links Between Gut Microbiota, Inflammatory Cytokines, and Parkinson's Disease: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

Brain Behav · 2024-11-01

DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70169PMID: 39607094

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThe association between gut microbiota (GM) and Parkinson's disease (PD) has been well established, but whether there is a causal relationship between the two and whether inflammatory cytokines (ICs) act as mediators remain unclear.MethodsWe utilized the summary databases of large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducting Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses to investigate the causal relationships between GM, ICs, and PD. The inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method was primarily used to identify GM and ICs associated with PD and to examine the mediating role of ICs, supplemented by MR Egger and weighted median.ResultsThrough MR analysis, we identified three positive causal relationships and six negative causal relationships between GM and PD. Additionally, there were three positive associations and five negative associations between ICs and PD. However, after adjusting for FDR, none of these associations were significant. In reverse MR analysis, we also found causal relationships between PD and various GM and ICs. Further, two-step MR analysis indicated that the negative impact of phylum Actinobacteria on PD may be mediated through Fms-related tyrosine kinase 3 ligand levels.ConclusionThis study strengthens the link between GM and the risk of PD, while also revealing the potential mediating role of ICs in the causal relationships between these factors.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.