SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The Comprehensive Anxiety and Parkinson's Scale (CAPS): co-development and initial validation of the long (CAPS-54) and short (CAPS-24) versions.

Disabil Rehabil · 2024-12-06

DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2024.2435522PMID: 39641402

Check source for accessValidation Study; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

PurposeAnxiety is a prevalent symptom of Parkinson's disease, but is often under-recognised and challenging to characterise. The present study aimed to develop a comprehensive new scale that characterised the specific and nuanced experience of anxiety in people living with Parkinson's disease. A shortened version of the scale was also developed. The psychometric properties of both versions of the scale were assessed for reliability and validity.MethodsSecondary analyses were conducted on data from 254 people with Parkinson's disease and anxiety collected in a modified Nominal Group Technique ranking survey. Secondary analyses included exploratory factor analysis, reliability and validity analyses, and confirmatory factor analysis.ResultsA standardised scale of anxiety and Parkinson's disease, in its long Comprehensive Anxiety and Parkinson's Scale - 54 (CAPS-54) and short versions (CAPS-24), was developed. Reliability and validity analyses of the scales demonstrated excellent factorial and internal consistency, as well as good convergent validity.ConclusionsThe CAP Scales offer researchers and clinicians a more comprehensive means of assessing the experience of anxiety in the context of Parkinson's disease than is currently available. Initial validation of the scales is promising. Future validation and identification of clinical boundaries with an independent sample is recommended.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.