SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The mechanism of SiJunZi decoction in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

Brain Res · 2024-12-10

DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2024.149397PMID: 39667552

Check source for accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is the second most common neurodegenerative disease, but treatment options for PD are limited, and drug development has reached a bottleneck. With the progress of the aging population, the number of PD patients in China is increasing day by day, imposing a heavy burden on patients and society. Therefore, it is urgent to explore targeted medicine based on the pathogenesis of PD and disease targets. Ancient physicians have used the traditional Chinese medicine formula SiJunZi decoction (SJZD) to treat PD. However, it is less commonly used clinically now, and its pharmacological mechanism still needs to be further elucidated. In this study, based on network pharmacology research and molecular docking technology, the mechanism of SJZD in treating PD was revealed, showing that the extract of SJZD acts on cell microdomain membranes and lipid rafts, affecting ubiquitin-protein ligase binding and ubiquitin-like protein ligase binding processes, and plays a role in neurogenesis. Molecular docking results showed that Ellipticine and Hederagenin in SJZD exhibited significant effects on targets: CASP3, BCL2, and PTGS2. The effect of SJZD reversing MPP+-induced SH-SY5Y cells injury was verified by experiments, concentrations ranging from 5ug/mL to 0.1ug/mL showed significant cell protection at 24 h.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.