NeuralCipher Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundModifiable lifestyle factors are implicated as risk factors for neurological and psychiatric disorders, but whether these associations are causal remains uncertain. We aimed to evaluate associations and ascertain causal relationships between modifiable lifestyle factors, neurological and psychiatric disorder risk, and brain structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) markers.MethodsWe analyzed data from over 50,000 UK Biobank participants with self-reported lifestyle factors, including alcohol consumption, smoking, physical activity, diet, sleep, electronic device use, and sexual factors. Primary outcomes were stroke, all-cause dementia, Parkinson's disease (PD), Major depression disorder (MDD), Anxiety Disorders (ANX), and Bipolar Disorder (BIP), alongside MRI markers. Summary statistics were obtained from genome-wide association studies and Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses investigated bidirectional associations between lifestyle factors, neurological/psychiatric disorders, and MRI markers, with mediation assessed using multivariable Mendelian randomization (MVMR).ResultsCross-sectional analyses identified lifestyle factors were associated with neurological and psychiatric disorders and brain morphology. MR confirmed causal relationships, including lifetime smoking index on Stroke, PD, MDD, ANX and BIP; play computer games on BIP; leisure screen time on Stroke and MDD; automobile speeding propensity on MDD; sexual factors on MDD and BIP; sleep characteristics on BIP and MDD. Brain structure mediated several lifestyle-disorder associations, such as daytime dozing and dementia, lifetime smoking and PD and age first had sexual intercourse and PD.ConclusionOur results provide support for a causal effect of multiple lifestyle measures on the risk of neurological and psychiatric disorders, with brain structural morphology serving as a potential biological mediator in their associations.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.