SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Rock Steady Boxing: A qualitative evaluation of a community exercise program for people with Parkinson's disease.

PLoS One · 2024-12-19

DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309522PMID: 39700094

Open accessresearch-article; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

PurposeRegular exercise can reduce the symptoms of Parkinson's disease, a common neurodegenerative disorder. The Rock Steady Boxing organization created an exercise program for people with Parkinson's Disease (pwPD) modelled after traditional boxing. The purpose of this study was to better understand the physical function, exercise beliefs, contextual factors, class experiences and outcome perceptions of pwPD participating in Rock Steady Boxing.Materials and methodsA pragmatic qualitative approach of semi-structured interviews and class observations was supplemented by cross-sectional physical function measures.ResultsTen study participants were community dwelling adults with Parkinson's Disease, participating in Rock Steady Boxing two to three times a week for an average of 10.6 (6.2) months. Most participants (7/10) had good mobility with Timed Up and Go scores below the 14.8 second average for community dwelling pwPD (7/10) and Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire-39 Mobility Scores 3/5. Thematic analysis revealed a history of exercise and strong exercise beliefs positively influenced participation. Rock Steady Boxing provided valued social interactions and offered individualized attention through personalized modifications.ConclusionsInstructor enthusiasm, program modifiability and social support drive participation and provide a challenge for differing abilities. RSB is a valued community offering for pwPD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.