SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Biological Amyloids Chemically Damage DNA.

ACS Chem Neurosci · 2025-01-09

DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.4c00461PMID: 39782739

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Amyloid fibrils are protein polymers noncovalently assembled through β-strands arranged in a cross-β structure. Biological amyloids were considered chemically inert until we and others recently demonstrated their ability to catalyze chemical reactions in vitro. To further explore the functional repertoire of amyloids, we here probe if fibrils of α-synuclein (αS) display chemical reactivity toward DNA. We demonstrate that αS amyloids bind DNA at micromolar concentrations in vitro. Using the activity of DNA repair enzymes as proxy for damage, we unravel that DNA-amyloid interactions promote chemical modifications, such as single-strand nicks, to the DNA. Double-strand breaks are also evident based on nanochannel analysis of individual long DNA molecules. The amyloid fold is essential for the activity as no DNA chemical modification is detected with αS monomers. In a yeast cell model, there is increased DNA damage when αS is overexpressed. Chemical perturbation of DNA adds another chemical reaction to the set of activities emerging for biological amyloids. Since αS amyloids are also found in the nuclei of neuronal cells of Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, and increased DNA damage is a hallmark of PD, we propose that αS amyloids contribute to PD by direct chemical perturbation of DNA.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.