SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Association between wide-ranging food intake and Parkinson's disease: a comprehensive mendelian randomization study.

Sci Rep · 2025-01-18

DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-85668-xPMID: 39827216

Open accessResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; research-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder influenced by both genetic and environmental factors, including dietary habits. Despite considerable research, the relationship between food intake and PD risk remains poorly understood. Here, we conducted a comprehensive Mendelian randomization analysis to investigate the association between a wide spectrum of food intake and PD risk. Utilizing data from large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and dietary databases, we constructed genetic instruments for various dietary factors, including fruit, vegetable, meat, fish, dairy, and grain intake, among others, totaling 170 different food items. Using multivariable inverse variance weighted methods, we found a causal relationship between Mozzarella intake and Parkinson's disease (odds ratio [OR] = 9.83, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.52-38.34, P-value < 0.05). Additionally, a causal relationship was observed between Pancake intake and Parkinson's disease (odds ratio [OR] = 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.07-0.59, P-value < 0.05). Furthermore, our reverse Mendelian randomization analysis and multivariable Mendelian randomization analysis provided further support for these findings. To our knowledge, we are the first to investigate the causal relationship between the broad intake of 170 different food items and Parkinson's disease. Our study reveals the causal relationships between Pancake intake, and Mozzarella intake with Parkinson's disease.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.