SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Motor Assessment Timed Test (MATT): A New Timed Test to Assess Functional Mobility in Parkinson's Disease Patients.

J Clin Med · 2025-01-09

DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020361PMID: 39860367

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background/Objectives: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative disorder that significantly impairs motor function, leading to mobility challenges and an increased risk of falls. Current assessment tools often inadequately measure the complexities of motor impairments associated with PD, highlighting the need for a reliable tool. This study introduces the Motor Assessment Timed Test (MATT), designed to assess functional mobility in PD patients. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted involving 57 participants (38 men and 19 women) aged 44 to 84, diagnosed with idiopathic PD. Participants were recruited from three PD associations and underwent a series of assessments, including MATT, to evaluate gait, balance, and dual-task performance under conditions that reflect real-life challenges faced by individuals with PD. Results: MATT demonstrated excellent reliability with intra-rater reliability (ICC = 0.99), inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.96-0.99), and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93-0.99). The coefficient of variation for total time and each segment ranged from 4.73% to 13.71%, indicating consistent performance across trials. The concurrent validity showed very high correlations with established tools such as the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test (ρ = 0.86, p p Conclusions: MATT is a promising tool for assessing motor complications in PD, offering a comprehensive evaluation of functional mobility. Its implementation in clinical practice could enhance the management of PD, facilitating tailored interventions and improving patient outcomes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.