SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Twenty-Three-Year Mortality in Parkinson's Disease: A Population-Based Prospective Study (NEDICES).

J Clin Med · 2025-01-14

DOI: 10.3390/jcm14020498PMID: 39860502

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background: Parkinson's disease (PD) is one of the most prevalent neurodegenerative disorders among older adults, yet its long-term impact on mortality within population-based cohorts remains insufficiently characterized. This study leverages data from the Neurological Disorders in Central Spain (NEDICES) cohort to provide a comprehensive 23-year mortality analysis in a Spanish population. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 5278 individuals aged 65 years and older were evaluated across two waves: baseline (1994-1995) and follow-up (1997-1998). At baseline, 81 prevalent PD cases were identified, while 30 incident cases, likely in the premotor phase at baseline, were detected during follow-up. Mortality was tracked over 23 years, and Cox proportional hazard models were employed to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality, adjusting for relevant demographic and clinical variables. Results: Fifty-three individuals from the cohort in the reference group (without PD) were excluded due to unreliable mortality data. Among 111 PD cases, 109 (98.2%) died during follow-up compared to 4440 (86.8%) of 5114 without the disease. PD was associated with a significantly increased mortality risk (adjusted HR = 1.62; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.31-2.01). Patients with both PD and dementia had an even higher risk (HR = 2.19; 95% CI = 1.24-3.89). Early-onset PD (p Conclusions: PD significantly increases mortality risk over 23 years, particularly among those with early onset and dementia. These findings underscore the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to PD care, targeting both motor and non-motor symptoms to enhance long-term outcomes.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.