SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The Views of Healthcare Professionals on iFall, a Smartphone Application for Falls Reporting in Parkinson's Disease: A Qualitative Study.

J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol · 2025-02-01

DOI: 10.1177/08919887251317728PMID: 39891532

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background: Accurate falls reporting is important in the management of Parkinson's disease. One way in which to improve accuracy is by providing a smartphone app to log fall events. This qualitative study sought to gain insights from healthcare professionals based in the United Kingdom on a novel smartphone application co-developed by people with Parkinson's (PwP) disease for falls reporting. Research Methods: A purposive sample of n=11 healthcare professionals with expertise in Parkinson's were recruited to take part in a focus group to explore their views on the smartphone app. Framework analysis was utilised to interpret the data. Results: Participants discussed the applications role in clinical practice, research, and provided recommendations for future improvements. Within the overarching theme of implementation of iFall in clinical and research practice, three subthemes emerged: (1) applicability to clinical practice, (2) the future of iFall in research and (3) future developments. The application was viewed positively, exhibiting potential to address important contemporary issues within falls reporting and research, whilst being clear, simple and easy to use. Implementation challenges of the application, such as IT integration were highlighted, while enhancements such as voice recognition were suggested. Conclusions: Incorporating suggestions from healthcare professionals and piloting of the application with PwP will increase the likelihood of successful implementation of the iFall app into clinical practice and research.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.