Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
Acetylcorynoline is an alkaloid isolated from the tubers of Corydalis ambigua Cham. et Schltdl. It has anti-inflammatory properties with the potential to treat Parkinson's disease. However, the use of UPLC-MS/MS for identifying acetylcorynoline in mouse plasma has not yet been explored. The present study aimed to develop a fast and selective method for determining the amount of acetylcorynoline in mouse plasma using UPLC-MS/MS. Plasma samples (10 μL) were prepared using methanol-induced protein precipitation following the addition of aconitine as an internal standard. The chromatographic separation was accomplished using a UPLC HSS T3 column with acetonitrile and 0.1% formic acid as the mobile phase. The analytes were run for 4.0 min in total. The target fragment ions m/z 410.4 ⟶ 350.3 for acetylcorynoline and m/z 646.6 ⟶ 586.5 for internal standard were used for quantification using multiple reaction monitoring mode. The mouse blood was obtained at different time points after intravenous (5 mg/kg) and oral (20 mg/kg) administration of acetylcorynoline. The calibration plots for acetylcorynoline in mouse plasma showed a linear trend over the whole range of 1-2000 ng/mL. Both the intraday and interday precision relative standard deviations were less than 11%. The half-life in mice was found to be 2.6 ± 0.7 h and 2.7 ± 0.8 h following oral and intravenous administration, respectively. The bioavailability was determined to be 58.9%. The pharmacokinetics and bioavailability of acetylcorynoline in mice were effectively analyzed using this UPLC-MS/MS method, which had a runtime of 4 min per sample and required only 10 μL of plasma.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.