SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

A prospective controlled study of a wearable rhythmic vibrotactile device for tremor in Parkinson's disease.

Clin Neurophysiol · 2025-02-07

DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2025.02.255PMID: 39978054

Check source for accessJournal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveTremor in Parkinson's disease (PD) does not always respond to dopaminergic medication, therefore new treatment strategies are needed. Preliminary evidence has suggested that manipulation of peripheral afferents may reduce tremor amplitude, but existing research is inconclusive and has not been properly controlled. Here, we explored the effects of peripheral vibrotactile stimulation (ViS) on PD tremor using a within-subjects controlled design.MethodsThirty PD patients with clear tremor were included. ViS (open-loop) was applied to the most affected wrist. Four stimulation conditions were compared: tremor frequency (TF), 1.5*TF, 80 Hz stimulation, and sham. We tested the effect of these stimulation conditions on tremor power (measured with accelerometry) during three contexts: rest tremor, rest tremor during cognitive load, and postural tremor. Entrainment between tremor and stimulation was tested using complex phase-locking value (PLV).ResultsThere were no significant effects on tremor power when ViS was applied. Stimulation effects did not depend on the context in which tremor occurred. PLVs showed that tremor phase was not influenced by ViS.ConclusionsOpen-loop ViS does not modulate PD tremor.SignificanceThis study is one of the first controlled large sample studies to investigate how ViS may influence the objective measures of tremor in PD.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.