Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
ObjectiveTo investigate the bidirectional relationship between depression and activities of daily living (ADL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and explore the mediating role of cognitive function over time.MethodsData from 892 PD patients from the Parkinson's Progression Markers Initiative (PPMI) database were included in this study, and depression, cognitive function, and ADL were measured using the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15), Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA), and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale, Part II (UPDRS II) respectively. The cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) was employed to analyze the reciprocal relationship between depression and ADL. Then, we explored the mediating role of cognitive function in the bidirectional relationship between depression and ADL in patients with PD, and the mediation effect test was carried out using a bias-corrected nonparametric percentile bootstrap approach.ResultsDepression in patients with PD predicted their subsequent ADL (β = 0.079, p β = 0.069, p β = 0.006, p = 0.074, 95%CI = 0.001 ~ 0.014), and cognitive function also played a significant mediating role in prediction of depression to ADL (β = 0.006, p = 0.067, 95%CI = 0.001 ~ 0.013).ConclusionThere is a bidirectional relationship between depression and ADL in patients with PD. Furthermore, we found that cognitive function mediates the relationship that exists between depression and ADL in patients with PD. Interventions aimed at enhancing cognitive function could potentially lessen the vicious cycle of depression and ADL in PD, thus improving patient quality of life (QOL).
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.