SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Polygenic Risk Score Combined with Transcranial Sonography Refines Parkinson's Disease Risk Prediction.

Mov Disord Clin Pract · 2025-02-28

DOI: 10.1002/mdc3.70011PMID: 40019135

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundDopaminergic neuron depletion in the substantia nigra (SN) and the pathological aggregation of α-synuclein are the neuropathological hallmarks of Parkinson's disease (PD).ObjectivesThis study aimed to investigate the association between the polygenic risk score for PD (PD-PRS) and transcranial sonography (TCS)-measured SN hyperechogenicity to enhance the accuracy of PD susceptibility prediction.MethodsPD-PRSs were calculated for over 41,000 Estonian Biobank participants age 55+ years without a PD diagnosis. Participants in the highest and lowest PD-PRS percentiles (n = 222) underwent TCS measurements and Sniffin' sticks olfactory testing. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to examine the associations between PD-PRS, risk and prodromal markers, and SN hyperechogenicity.ResultsData from 204 participants with TCS measurements were analyzed, including 107 individuals in the high-risk PD-PRS group and 97 in the low-risk PD-PRS group. Incorporating PD-PRS group assignment improved the explained variance in SN hyperechogenicity from 17.2% to 31.9%. Participants in the low-risk PD-PRS group had 0.16 times lower odds (95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.07-0.35, P ConclusionsOur findings indicate that TCS-measured SN hyperechogenicity is associated with PD-PRS and olfactory impairment. This combined assessment may improve early diagnosis of prodromal PD by pinpointing individuals at increased risk.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.