SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Associations of the Life's Essential 8 with Parkinson's disease: a population-based study.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2025-02-18

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1510411PMID: 40040744

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundParkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder with increasing global prevalence. This study investigated the association between the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 (LE8) and PD prevalence using a large, nationally representative database.MethodsWe analyzed data from 18,277 participants aged 40 years and older from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2005-2018. LE8 scores were calculated based on diet, physical activity, nicotine exposure, sleep, body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure. PD cases were identified through self-reported anti-PD medication use. Multivariate logistic regression models were employed to examine the association between LE8 and PD prevalence, adjusting for various demographic and clinical factors. In addition, we performed restricted cubic splines (RCS), subgroup analyses, and weighted quantile sum (WQS) regression to verify the robustness of the study results.ResultsThe prevalence of PD was 1.3% in the study population. After full adjustment, individuals with moderate (50-79) and high (80-100) LE8 scores showed lower odds of PD compared to those with low (0-49) scores (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29-0.97 and OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.17-1.04, respectively; p for trend ConclusionOur findings suggest a significant inverse association between Life's Essential 8 (LE8) and PD prevalence, with dietary factors and glycemic health emerging as the most influential components.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.