SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Gamma entrainment induced by deep brain stimulation as a biomarker for motor improvement with neuromodulation.

Nat Commun · 2025-03-26

DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-58132-7PMID: 40140380

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Finely tuned gamma (FTG) oscillations from the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and cortex in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients undergoing deep brain stimulation (DBS) are often associated with dyskinesia. Recently it was shown that DBS entrains gamma activity at 1:2 of the stimulation frequency; however, the functional role of this signal is not yet fully understood. We recorded local field potentials from the STN in 19 chronically implanted PD patients on dopaminergic medication during DBS, at rest, and during repetitive movements. Here we show that high-frequency DBS induced 1:2 gamma entrainment in 15/19 patients. Spontaneous FTG was present in 8 patients; in five of these patients dyskinesia occurred or were enhanced with entrained gamma activity during stimulation. Further, there was a significant increase in the power of 1:2 entrained gamma activity during movement in comparison to rest, while patients with entrainment had faster movements compared to those without. These findings argue for a functional relevance of the stimulation-induced 1:2 gamma entrainment in PD patients as a prokinetic activity that, however, is not necessarily promoting dyskinesia. DBS-induced entrainment can be a promising neurophysiological biomarker for identifying the optimal amplitude during closed-loop DBS.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.