SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Target-Controlled Sedation with Propofol Infusion for PEG-J Placement in Advanced Parkinson's Disease: A Prospective Observational Study on Safety and Feasibility.

Life (Basel) · 2025-03-18

DOI: 10.3390/life15030492PMID: 40141835

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

IntroductionThe management of sedation during percutaneous endoscopic gastrojejunostomy (PEG-J) placement in patients with advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) is challenging due to the complex interactions between PD treatment, anesthetic agents, and the disease's motor and non-motor symptoms. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of a target-controlled infusion (TCI) propofol protocol in the context of PEG-J placement in advanced PD patients.Materials and methodsThis prospective study included 169 patients diagnosed with advanced Parkinson's disease (Hoehn and Yahr stages 4 and 5) who underwent PEG-J placement at Târgu Mureș County Emergency Clinical Hospital, Romania. Sedation was induced and maintained using TCI propofol, with additional benzodiazepines and short-acting opioids, while muscle relaxants were not used. Procedural success rates and adverse outcomes were assessed for 30 days post-procedure.ResultsThe sedation protocol demonstrated a high procedural success rate. No deaths were reported within 30 days post-procedure.ConclusionThis study highlights the feasibility and clinical applicability of a TCI propofol protocol for PEG-J placement in patients with advanced PD (stages 4 and 5). While no deaths were recorded within the 30-day follow-up, the sample size is insufficient to draw definitive conclusions regarding long-term safety.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.