SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Antero-Lateral Subthalamic Nucleus Theta Stimulation Improves Verbal Fluency in Parkinson's Disease.

Mov Disord · 2025-04-02

DOI: 10.1002/mds.30185PMID: 40172532

Open accessbrief-report; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

ObjectiveLow-frequency deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) has been associated with positive effects on verbal fluency (VF) in patients with Parkinson's disease. This prospective study investigates stimulation direction-dependent and site-specific effects of theta frequency DBS on VF.MethodsIn a double-blind, cross-over design (n = 20), we tested VF during left subthalamic theta stimulation (stimulation-off, omnidirectional, and threedirectional stimulation conditions). DBS electrode localization and electric field calculations were performed (n = 18). Probabilistic sweet spot mapping identified voxels with significant change in VF.ResultsBest directional stimulation improved VF performance significantly compared with the stimulation-off and omnidirectional stimulation condition. This effect followed a medial-to-anterolateral gradient with higher VF improvement observed on the border between the motor and associative subparts of the STN.ConclusionWe provide first proof-of-principle evidence that directional theta frequency DBS improves VF, possibly related to stimulation of the anterolateral STN. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.