Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
BackgroundMotor fluctuations are routinely documented using the Parkinson's disease (PD) home diary. However, the validity of this diary when compared to clinical observers is limited.ObjectiveThis study disassembled the effects of nonmotor symptoms (NMS) on inter-method agreement between the PD home motor diary and clinical observers (outside validity criterion).MethodsA prospective observational VALIDATE-PD cohort study in advanced PD assessing symptom severity by simultaneous hourly ratings using the home diary (Off, On, dyskinetic state) and a nonmotor diary (11 key NMSs) was performed. Test validity measures (accuracy and Cohen's κ) were compared between hours with and without co-occurring NMS.ResultsFour hundred eighty-seven hourly time periods from 47 participants were analyzed. Inter-method agreement (accuracy, Cohen's κ) of the motor diary was independent of co-occurring NMSs, but simultaneous NMSs inversely influence false ratings of motor Off and On states.ConclusionsSimultaneously occurring NMSs do not affect general validity but the interpretation of the PD home motor diary.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.