SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Neuroprotective properties of transition metal dichalcogenide nanoflowers alleviate acute and chronic neurological conditions linked to mitochondrial dysfunction.

J Biol Chem · 2025-04-09

DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2025.108498PMID: 40216249

Open accessresearch-article; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Mitochondrial dysfunction is an expected cause of etiology and progression in numerous human neurological pathologies, including stroke, Alzheimer's, and Parkinson's diseases. Therefore, a neuroprotective treatment is an urgent and unmet need. Transition metal dichalcogenide nanoflowers (TMD NFs) exhibit unique biological properties. However, neuroprotective properties of these nanomaterials remain poorly understood. In the current study, the biological effect of molybdenum disulfide and molybdenum diselenide TMD NFs on neurons and astrocytes was investigated. It was found that both nanomaterials lowered reactive oxygen species levels, reduced mitochondrial impairment, and increased mitochondrial biogenesis. Neuroprotective effects of both TMD NFs resulted from upregulation of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma coactivator 1 alpha pathway, the biological system responsible for mitochondrial biogenesis. Furthermore, administration of TMD NFs to Caenorhabditis elegans extended lifespan of the nematodes. These results indicate that TMD NFs can be used as novel neuroprotective therapeutic agents against acute and chronic neurological condition linked to mitochondrial dysfunction.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.