SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

The Significance of High-Density Lipoprotein-Derived Inflammatory Parameters in Atypical Parkinsonisms-Pilot Study.

J Clin Med · 2025-03-24

DOI: 10.3390/jcm14072212PMID: 40217664

Open accessbrief-report; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Background/Objectives: Atypical parkinsonisms are a group of diseases with significant obstacles in the context of efficient methods of examination and understanding pathomechanisms. This is associated with the overlaps in clinical manifestation. One of the hypotheses regarding the mechanism leading to neurodegeneration in this group is related to inflammation. Methods: Authors examined 18 patients with Multiple System Atrophy-Parkinsonism Predominant (MSA-P), 15 with Progressive Supranuclear Palsy-Richardson's Syndrome (PSP-RS) and 15 with PSP-Parkinsonism Predominant (PSP-P) (disease duration: 3-6 years) using neutrophil-to-lymphocyte-ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-derived inflammatory ratios, e.g., neutrophil to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (NHR), lymphocyte to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (LHR) and platelet to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (PHR). The potential differences between the groups were examined using one-way ANOVA, with Tukey's HSD test. Results: The comparison revealed significant differences between PSP-RS and MSA-P in NHR (p = 0.0224). The levels of the parameters were more increased in MSA-P. No other significant differences were found. Conclusions: The possible significance of HDL in the context of brain-blood barrier permeability is a repeatedly highlighted feature of neurodegenerative diseases. The outcome of this pilot study may suggest that the evaluation of inflammatory processes should be performed with the indication of subtypes of PSP, as the character of pathomechanisms likely differs.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.