SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Neural network localization in Parkinson's disease with impulse control disorders.

Front Aging Neurosci · 2025-03-28

DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1549589PMID: 40224960

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

BackgroundThere is a huge heterogeneity of magnetic resonance imaging findings in Parkinson's disease (PD) with impulse control disorders (ICDs) studies. Here, we hypothesized that brain regions identified by structural and functional imaging studies of PD with ICDs could be reconciled in a common network.MethodsIn this study, an initial systematic literature review was conducted to collect and evaluate whole-brain functional and structural magnetic resonance imaging studies related to PD with ICDs. We subsequently utilized the Human Connectome Project (HCP) dataset (n = 1,093) and a novel functional connectivity network mapping (FCNM) technique to identify a common brain network affected in PD with ICDs.ResultsA total of 19 studies with 25 contrasts, incorporating 345 individuals with PD and ICDs, and 787 individuals with PD without ICDs were included in the analysis. By using the HCP dataset and a novel FCNM technique, we ultimately identified that the aberrant neural networks predominantly involve the default mode network (middle and inferior temporal gyrus, anterior cingulate cortex, angular gyrus) and subcortical network (caudate nucleus).ConclusionThis study suggests that the heterogeneous neuroimaging findings in PD with ICDs can be attributed to shared abnormalities in the default mode and subcortical networks. These dysfunctions are associated with impaired self-regulation, decision-making, and heightened impulsivity in PD with ICDs. Our findings integrate diverse neuroimaging results from previous studies, providing a clearer understanding of the neurobiological mechanisms underlying PD with ICDs at a network level.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.