SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Characterization of Isolated Human Astrocytes from Aging Brain.

Int J Mol Sci · 2025-04-05

DOI: 10.3390/ijms26073416PMID: 40244314

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Astrocytes have multiple crucial roles, including maintaining brain homeostasis and synaptic function, performing phagocytic clearance, and responding to injury and repair. It has been suggested that astrocyte performance is progressively impaired with aging, leading to imbalances in the brain's internal milieu that eventually impact neuronal function and lead to neurodegeneration. Until now, most evidence of astrocytic dysfunction in aging has come from experiments done with whole tissue homogenates, astrocytes collected by laser capture, or cell cultures derived from animal models or cell lines. In this study, we used postmortem-derived whole cells sorted with anti-GFAP antibodies to compare the unbiased, whole-transcriptomes of human astrocytes from control, older non-impaired individuals and subjects with different neurodegenerative diseases, such as Parkinson's disease (PD), Alzheimer's disease (ADD), and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). We found hundreds of dysregulated genes between disease and control astrocytes. In addition, we identified numerous genes shared between these common neurodegenerative disorders that are similarly dysregulated; in particular, UBC a gene for ubiquitin, which is a protein integral to cellular homeostasis and critically important in regulating function and outcomes of proteins under cellular stress, was upregulated in PSP, PD, and ADD when compared to control.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.