SCIENTIFIC HUB

Follow the evidence.

SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE · MED

Rod-Shaped NanoZnTPyP Paper-Based Sensor for Visual Detection of Dopamine in Human Plasma.

J Anal Methods Chem · 2025-04-14

DOI: 10.1155/jamc/9981628PMID: 40260265

Open accessresearch-article; Journal ArticleOriginal source ↗

Research overview

The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by

Dopamine (DA) is a catecholamine neurotransmitter secreted by the human adrenal medulla and is related to many medical diseases. The rapid and sensitive detection of DA levels in physiological media is attracting attention. This paper has developed a fluorescence paper-based sensor using CdTe quantum dots (QDs)-rod nanozinc 5, 10, 15, 20-tetra (4-pyridyl)-21H-23H-porphine (nanoZnTPyP) for sensitive and visual detection of DA. After adding DA, the original quenching fluorescence of the CdTe QDs-rod nanoZnTPyP sensor was effectively restored. The detection mechanism may be that the oxidation of DA to the alkaline CdTe QDs-rod nanoZnTPyP solution produced DA-quinine, and the recovery of fluorescence was caused by the electronic effect of DA-quinine and rod-shaped nanoZnTPyP. The detection range is 0.5∼10 nmol/L, and the limit of detection (LOD) is 0.38 nmol/L (S/N = 3). The sensor system was used on paper device to detect significant changes in the fluorescent color of DA at different concentrations. In addition, this method has been successfully used for the determination of DA in human plasma. The sensor system is simple, easy to operate, and has high selectivity for possible DA interfering substances, which provided new ideas for detecting DA and Parkinson's disease, Alzheimer's disease, and other DA-related diseases.

Scientific assessment

01

Research question

Assess the question within the original study’s scope.

02

Methods & sample

Check the source article for study design and sample details.

03

Key findings

An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.

04

Limitations

Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.

Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.