Research overview
The text below is the source article’s original abstract under a verified reuse license. cc by
IntroductionFreezing of gait (FOG) is a significant symptom in Parkinson's Disease (PD) that has been associated with attentional set shifting deficits, suggesting an underlying frontostriatal neurobiology. Whilst to date Start Hesitation (SH) has been regarded as a subtype of FOG, whether it shares the same underlying neural correlates remains unknown. The specific correlation of SH with other clinical features might help to elucidate its neurobiological underpinnings, which could potentially offer novel treatment strategies.MethodsIn this study, 72 PD patients underwent a previously validated VR gait paradigm in either On, Off or both medication states to identify episodes of SH. Participants also underwent a standardized clinical battery covering motor and non-motor features, including neuropsychometric testing across domains of attention, language, working memory, and visuospatial function.ResultsThe presence of SH was identified in 48 of the 72 patients. Compared to patients without SH, those demonstrating SH had a significantly higher depression score (3.8 vs 2.2, p = 0.045) and reported more REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (5.8 vs 3.3, p = 0.005). Notably, there were no significant group differences in age, disease duration, MDS-UPDRS scores, motor phenotype, falls risk, or any cognitive domains. In those patients with SH, there were no correlations of large magnitude between the duration of SH episodes and any relevant clinical, demographic or neuropsychometric measures.ConclusionThese results suggest that the neurobiological underpinnings of SH are distinct from those reported across FOG and may relate more to brainstem pathology. Further neuroimaging and neurophysiological approaches are now required.
Scientific assessment
Research question
Assess the question within the original study’s scope.
Methods & sample
Check the source article for study design and sample details.
Key findings
An editorially approved findings summary is not yet published for this record.
Limitations
Generalizability, bias and clinical meaning require separate assessment.
Methods, samples and clinical conclusions are not inferred from bibliographic metadata.